Search for: "Lloyd Howard" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 3:00 am by Doug Austin
In this case, United States Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd of the Northern District of California compelled Facebook to produce ESI that was previously produced in a converted, non-searchable format and further ordered Facebook not to use a third-party vendor's online production software to merely “provide access” to it. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:34 am by Andrew Ramonas
But the firm received $130,000 from Aflac for the efforts of then-of counsels Thomas Howell and Alan Wolff and $110,000 from Lloyd’s for the work of Landgraf, Marshall and then-associate Paul Howard II. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tuttle, The Forms and Limits of Religious Accommodation: The Case of RLUIPA, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 32, 2011).Lloyd H. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:00 am by Dan Ernst
William Howard Taft and the Struggle for the Soul of the Constitution; Sidney M. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:03 am
Judge Howard Lloyd disagreed, however, finding that Veoh has taken "great pains" to comply with copyright laws and the DMCA: "Far from encouraging copyright infringement, Veoh has a strong DMCA policy, takes active steps to limit incidents of infringement on its website and works diligently to keep unauthorized works off its site. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Lloyd Bullock was an assistant prosecutor at the time. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
District Judge Howard Lloyd’s summary judgment opinion that dismisses a 2006 suit brought by Io Group, an adult-entertainment production company. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 10 November 2021 the UK Supreme Court will had down the long awaited judgment in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
John Doe Assigned to: Magistrate Judge Howard R. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:33 am by melon@beat-law.com (Howie Cockrill)
Judge Howard Lloyd, of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, ruled that Veoh had fulfilled the requirements necessary to be eligible for safe harbor protection and was thus not liable for copyright infringement. [read post]